Peroxisome
Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) –A Review
Merlin N.J.*, Sufiyan, Chitra C. Nair,
Shaiju S. Dharan
Ezhuthachan College of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Marayamuttom, Neyyattinkara,
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
merlinbinu76@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT:
PPARs are ligand-activated
transcription factors involved in the transcriptional regulation of key
metabolic pathways such as lipid metabolism, adipogenesis,
and insulin sensitivity. More recent work implicates all 3 PPAR isotypes (α, γ, and δ) in inflammatory and
atherosclerotic pathways. Because these nuclear receptors are activated by
extracellular signals and control multiple gene targets, PPARs can be seen as
nodes that control multiple inputs and outputs involved in energy balance,
providing insight into how metabolism and the vasculature may be integrated.
The ongoing clinical use of synthetic PPAR agonists, eg,
insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and
lipid-lowering fibrates, and the evidence that PPAR
activation also may limit inflammation and atherosclerosis have only heightened
this interest and the pursuit of novel PPAR agonists. Together, these various
observations have stimulated intense interest in PPARs as therapeutic targets
and led to large-scale cardiovascular end-point trials with PPAR agonists.
INTRODUCTION:
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of
nuclear receptor proteins that function as transcription factors regulating the
expression of genes. PPARs play essential roles in the regulation of cellular
differentiation, development, and metabolism (carbohydrate, lipid, protein),
and tumorigenesis of higher organisms. Three types of
PPARs have been identified: alpha, gamma, and delta (beta): (alpha) – expressed in liver, kidney, heart,
muscle, adipose tissue, and others ß/d (beta/delta) – expressed in many tissues
but markedly in brain, adipose tissue, and skin γ (gamma) – although
transcribed by the same gene, this PPAR through alternative splicing is
expressed in three forms: γ1 – expressed in virtually all tissues,
including heart, muscle, colon, kidney, pancreas, and spleen γ2 –
expressed mainly in adipose tissue (30 amino acids longer) γ3 – expressed
in macrophages, large intestine, white adipose tissue.
PPAR
biology
PPARs contain 5 modular domains: a ligand-binding
domain (LBD) in which the specific PPAR agonist binds, a transactivating
domain which, in response to ligand binding,
undergoes a permissive conformational change required for transcriptional
activation; and a DNA-binding domain, which interacts with specific PPAR
response elements (PPRE) in the promoter region of PPAR-regulated target genes.
Three PPAR isotypes have been identified: PPARγ,
PPARα, and PPARδ.
Despite unique attributes of each PPAR isotype, these
receptors also share a common biology. PPAR activation is initiated by the
binding of a cognate ligand to the LBD of a specific
PPAR isotype Ligand binding
and activation function 2 movement allow PPAR heterodimerization
with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), another nuclear receptor activated by its
own ligand (purportedly 9 cis-retinoic
acid), which is required for transcriptional PPAR activity. RXR also can dimerize with itself or other specific nuclear receptor
partners. Through their respective DNA binding domains, the PPAR/RXR complex
binds to DNA at sequence-specific regions in gene promoters known as PPREs,
which consist of direct repeats of DNA separated by a single nucleotide.
Transcriptional
PPAR responses also depend heavily on ligand-induced
recruitment or release of small accessory molecules known as coactivators and corepressors,
respectively. These cofactors, a large, diverse family involving multiple
members such as nuclear corepressor, PPAR-binding
protein, PPARγ coactivator,
and cAMP response element-binding protein are
critical determinants of the cellular PPAR response. This multiprotein
complex induces transcription by chromatin remodeling and interaction with the
basal transcriptional machinery. In contrast to the positive regulation of
target genes described earlier, PPAR activation also can repress transcription.
This is a common but less-well-understood theme in PPAR-mediated repression of
inflammation.
PPARs
Role in Lipid metabolism and Energy Homeostasis
PPARs in the digestive tract
Triglycerides and
phospholipids from the diet are mainly absorbed in the duodenum and jejunum,
while cholesterol is mainly absorbed in the ileum. In these intestinal regions, the high PPARα and PPARβ
expression correlates with the expression of the enterocytic
fatty acid binding protein (FABPs) genes, the I-FABP and L-FABP, and of the
cellular retinol binding protein genes. A strong positive regulation of the
L-FABP gene occurs upon dietary intake of long-chain fatty acids or direct ileal infusion of linoleic acid
or a-bromopalmitate, which are PPARα
and PPARβ ligands, whereas I-FABP was
unaffected. A clofibrate-enriched diet also induces
LFABP gene expression and further suggests a relationship between PPAR and FABP
expression in the gut. 1
PPAR,
circulating lipoproteins, and cholesterol metabolism.
Cholesterol is an
essential component of cell membranes and is the molecule from which steroids
are synthesized and which serves as precursor for bile acid synthesis. The main
source of cholesterol is the diet. If this supply is insufficient, then
cholesterol synthesis is induced mainly in liver cells but also in many other
cells. Two transcription factors are currently known to have a strong impact on
intracellular cholesterol metabolism: SREBP and LXRa.
Little is known about the putative role of the different PPAR isotypes with respect to regulation of cholesterol, except
that cellular cholesterol levels in preadipocyte
influence PPARγ expression. This effect is
mediated by adipocyte determination and
differentiation factor 1 (ADD1)/SREBP1, which is preferentially involved in
fatty acid synthesis, whereas SREBP2 plays a role in intracellular cholesterol
metabolism. Such functional interactions between transcription factors suggest
interconnected regulations of cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. In
addition to intracellular cholesterol metabolism, the regulation of circulating
cholesterol levels has a high physiopathological
relevance since, qualitatively and quantitatively, it is a risk factor for
atherosclerosis and its associated diseases. The cholesterol-enriched low
density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are formed by release of the triglyceride
content of VLDL via the action of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). The released fatty
acids are either stored in the adipose tissue or oxidized to generate ATP in
different tistissues, especially muscle. High density
lipoprotein (HDL), in contrast to LDL, is considered as a “good”
cholesterol-containing lipoprotein particle as it has a protective effect on
atherosclerosis development. Indeed, it is instrumental in removing excess
cholesterol from extrahepatic cells and in
transporting it to the liver and steroidogenic
organs, where it is taken up via the scavenger receptor BI. The role of PPARs
in this general picture is reflected by the therapeutic benefits of fibrates, which are the first efficient lipid-lowering
drugs to be used. Fibrate treatment both enhances
catabolism of triglyceride-rich particles and reduces VLDL production.
Furthermore, it stimulates HDL apolipoprotein
expression.
One other important
mechanism of the fibrate lipidlowering
effect is believed to be an increased LPL activity through PPAR-mediated
activation of LPL gene expression. LDL and HDL blood levels also depend in part
on the synthesis, mainly by the liver, of the apolipoproteins
required for their assembly. Several of these apolipoproteins
are regulated by fibrates via PPARs. Fibrates down-regulate the production of apoCIII, an atherogenic component
of apoBcontaining lipoproteins, which inhibits LPL
activity andimpairs the uptake by the liver of
triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Direct
support for these apoCIII effects is provided by
transgenic animal studies showing a correlation between liver apoCIII expression and plasma triglyceride levels.
Consequently, down-regulation of hepatic apoCIII
production by PPARa appears to be beneficial since lipolysis of VLDL particles is increased and the resulting
LDL is efficiently removed from the plasma. In humans, apolipoprotein
AI and AII, which are the major HDL apolipoproteins,
are up-regulated by PPAR through transcriptional control, while ApoAI expression is down-regulated in rodents.2
Pleiotropic
roles of PPARα in the liver
Regardless of the fate of fatty acids in the liver, two first
steps fatty acid transport across the cell membrane and activation into an acyl-CoA are required for further processing of the fatty
acids. These two steps are facilitated through the induction of a fatty acid
transporter protein (FATP) and FAT by ligand-activated
PPARα as well as by the up-regulation at the
transcriptional level of the long-chain fatty acid ACS gene. Formation of fatty
acyl-CoA by ACS precedes either their incorporation
into triglycerides (the anabolic pathway) or their oxidation (the catabolic pathway)
by two major pathways: peroxisomal β-oxidation
and mitochondrial β -oxidation. For each of these pathways, the expression
of some key enzymes is up-regulatedby PPARα.
PPARα and peroxisomal β-oxidation
Peroxisome proliferation, which can be triggered in
rodents but not in humans,corresponds
to an increase in the volume density of peroxisomes
and of the peroxisomal fatty acid β -oxidation
activity. This activity is inducible by
signals such as exposure to cold, high-fat diet, and thyroid hormone, but also
by a wide variety of compounds collectively called peroxisome proliferators that includes certain hypolipidemic drugs.
PPARα and mitochondrial β -oxidation
Mitochondrial β
-oxidation greatly contributes to energy production via oxidative phosphorylation generating ATP. The role of PPARα in energy homeostasis is linked to the extent
with which PPARα regulates this pathway. As far
as energy conservation is concerned, mitochondrial β -oxidation is
approximately twice as efficient as peroxisomal
β -oxidation. The first limiting step in mitochondrial b-oxidation is the
entry flux of fatty acids into the mitochondria, which is controlled by a carnitine-dependent facilitated transport system. This
control is not only quantitative but also qualitative since it excludes the
very-long-chain fatty acids. One of its
critical components, the carnitine palmitoyl transferase I (CPT I),
catalyzes the formation of fatty acyl carnitine for translocation across the inner mitochondrial
membrane. This enzyme is strongly induced by peroxisome
proliferators and fatty acids, and a functional PPRE has been characterized in
the promoter sequence of the muscle-type CPTI gene. PPARα
further regulates the mitochondrial β -oxidative spiral by modulating the
expression of the medium- chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) gene. 3
PPARs
and control of inflammatory responses
Lipid
mediators, particularly eicosanoids such as
prostaglandins, leukotrienes, thromboxanes,
and lipoxins, are involved in a variety of
physiological processes including stimulation or inhibition of inflammation.
Therapeutic control of an inflammatory response can be achieved either by
blocking the membrane receptors mediating the action of inflammatory molecules
or by modulating their metabolic fate through inhibition of their synthesis or
stimulation of their breakdown. The
first indication of a role of PPAR in controlling inflammation was the
demonstration that LTB4, a potent chemotactic
inflammatory eicosanoid whose activity is mediated by
a membrane receptor (333), also binds to PPARα
and induces transcription of genes of the v- and b-oxidation pathways that can
neutralize and degrade LTB4 itself. In agreement with the above, dietary n-3
fatty acids and clofibrate, which also bind PPARα, have been reported to accelerate catabolism of
LTB4 in granulocytes and macrophages.
Conversely, PPARα-deficient mice show a proprolonged inflammatory response when challenged with
LTB4 or its precursor arachidonic acid, possibly due
to the absence of stimulation of the catabolic pathways, hence, the increased
duration of the inflammation. Inhibition
of the synthesis of proinflammatory molecules such as
interleukin 6 (IL-6) and prostaglandins by activated smooth muscle cells also
appears to participate in PPARα-mediated control
of inflammation via a decreased activity of NF-kB, a
transcription factor regulating cytokine production.
Recent
studies demonstrate that PPARγ too may have an
important impact on inflammation, as treatment of activated macrophages with
high doses of the PPARγ ligand
15-deoxy- D12,14-PGJ2 provokes a resting phenotype and
inhibits the production of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase and therefore nitric oxide, as well as that of gelatinase B and scavenger receptor A. This inhibition is
due to an antagonizing activity of PPARα
directed toward the activity of the transcription factors AP-1, STAT, and NF-kB, which are known to control cytokine gene expression. As
an interesting complement to these observations, fenofibrate
treatment administered to hyperlipidemic patients not
only lowers blood lipid values as previously discussed, but leads to a decrease
in the blood of acute-phase proteins, whose levels of expression reflect
systemic inflammation. This observation
suggests that diets that modify PPAR activity and circulating lipid levels
might also have a regulatory effect on inflammatory processes. 4
PPARs and
atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis
is a pathological process that ultimately leads to the localized obstruction of
an artery due to the progressive build-up in the arterial wall of an atheromatous plaque. At least three pathological processes
participate in plaque formation: foam cell differentiation, inflammatory
reaction, and cell proliferation. The
passage of monocytes from the luminal endothelial
surface to the subendothelial space where they
differentiate into macrophages is the initial step. The presence of these
resident macrophages in the intima of the vascular
wall and high levels of LDL in the blood favor a modification of the LDL
particles through oxidation or other poorly defined processes. Endocytosis of these particles by macrophages is then
mediated by scavenger receptors. In contrast to the LDL receptor, these
receptors are not down-regulated by the intracellular cholesterol content and
thus allow an excessive accumulation of intracellular lipids resulting in the
formation of lipid-laden foam cells. Cytokines produced by these activated
macrophage/ foam cells include the macrophage-colony stimulating factor, IL-1,
and TNFa, which form the basis of the inflammatory
component of the atherosclerotic lesion and promote proliferation of smooth
muscle cells. Necrosis of macrophages and lipid-loaded foam cells releases
their intracellular contents, resulting in an accumulation of extracellular
components that form the fibrous cap of the atheromatous
lesion. Eventually, the rupture of this plaque leads to the acute arterial
obstruction.
Many
aspects of these pathological processes might be modulated by PPARs. The role of PPAR in the adipose differentiation program, present
similarities with the formation of foam cells. In addition, attention
has recently been given, using THP1 cells, to the activation of the monocyte-macrophage transition and the concomitant
up-regulation of the CD36 scavenger receptor, whose gene is a direct PPAR
target. Both phenomenons are under the positive
control of PPAR
which is itself up-regulated by oxidized LDL Furthermore, expression of PPAR
has
indeed been demonstrated in mouse and human atherosclerotic lesions. In
contrast to this apparently proatherosclerotic action
of PPAR
, inhibition of inflammatory cytokine
production by the activated receptor might explain the beneficial effect of TZD
in preventing atherosclerotic plaque progression. Similarly, inhibition of the
macrophage activities by oxidized LDL whose 9-HODE (9-hydroyxyoctadecadienoic
acid) and 13-HODE components are PPARγ ligands, has been observed. Obviously, further studies are
needed to determine the exact role of PPARγ in
the development of atherosclerosis. Proliferation of aortic smooth muscle
cells, which express both PPARα and PPAR
, also likely contributes to both atherogenesis and restenosis
processes. Activation of PPAR
in
these cells leads to a beneficial decrease of the phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate-induced matrix metalloproteinase gene expression. 5
PPARs and the
development of the fetal epidermal permeability barrier
Nuclear receptors
which interact with the retinoid X receptor are involved in the regulation of
epidermal differentiation and development.
Cutaneous development in utero
was affected by peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor or farnesoid X-activated receptor
activators, or by an activator of another retinoid X receptor partner, liver X
receptor. Peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor-
and -
and liver X
receptor-
and -
mRNAs were
detected in fetal epidermis by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction
and northern analyses. The presence of these receptors and the ability of their
activators to stimulate epidermal barrier and stratum corneum
development suggest a physiologic role for peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor and liver X receptor
and their endogenous ligands in the regulation of cutaneous
development. 6
PPARs,
carcinogenesis, and control of the cell cycle
Studies
based on tumor cell lines have implicated PPAR
in
cell cycle withdrawal. One of the first pieces of evidence implicating PPAR
in
the control of cell cycle came from the observation that PPAR
activation decreased the binding of the E2F/DP
heterodimers to its target genes. This decrease in E2F/DP
activity is in part mediated by PPAR
through the down-regulation of the PP2A
protein phosphatase Inhibition of E2F/DP activity can
also be achieved via activation of RB. Interestingly, PPAR
ligands were shown to inhibit phosphorylation
of RB in vascular smooth muscle cells, therefore contributing to maintain RB in
its active form. Consequently, the G1/S transition in these cells was
abrogated. Another suggested mechanism involving PPAR gamma in the mediation of
cell cycle arrest was provided by the study of Morrison and Farmer (1999), who
suggested a role of PPAR
in
up-regulating the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p18 and p21 during adipogenesis.
PPAR
hence could control the expression not only of
genes involved in the acquisition of a differentiated phenotype but also of
genes involved in the negative regulation of cell cycle. 7
Pharmaceutical Drugs Targeting PPAR- Fibrates and Thiazolidinediones
Fibrates and Cholesterol
Fibrates, fibric acid
derivatives, are cholesterol-lowering drugs that work by decreasing the amount
of circulating plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. Most fibrates
also increase HDL levels. The potential side effects of fibrates
have limited their use, but they have been shown to be successful in
controlling cholesterol levels.
Two fibrates will
be examined here:
·
Bezafibrate
·
Gemfibrozil
Bezafibrate
Bezafibrate is primarily a PPAR-alpha agonist, but
also has some interaction with PPAR-beta. The intervention of bezafibrate was shown to decrease plasma fibrinogen
(involved in blood clotting) levels, reduce plasma cholesterol and triglyceride
levels, and increase HDL levels, all of which worked to stop or reverse
atherosclerosis progression. Results showed that bezafibrate
treatment reduced plasma triglycerides by 21% and increased HDL levels by 18%. Bezafibrate treatment was a safe and effective way to
reduce plasma triglyceride levels and increase HDL levels.
Gemfibrozil
Like bezafibrate,
gemfibrozil has been shown to decrease cholesterol
and plasma triglyceride levels while increasing HDL levels. Gemfibrozil
reduced the risk of CHD by 34% in the experimental group by decreasing
cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, and LDL levels while increasing HDL levels.
Because of fibrates effectiveness in treating dyslipidemia and CHD by increasing HDL levels, their use
has been combined with the use of statins, drugs that
decrease LDL levels by interrupting cholesterol formation. Statins,
if not eliminated, can be myotoxic. Use of gemfibrozil with statins
increases the risk of myotoxicity due to inhibition statin elimination. Therefore, the combination is not recommended.
Thiazolidinediones and Insulin Sensitivity
Type II diabetes usually results from
obesity or inactivity, specifically though, visceral obesity. Normally, insulin
has an antilipolytic effect on fat cells, though some
fat cells seem to be "dysfunctional" in that they do not respond to
insulin. These dysfunctional fat cells release fatty acids even in the presence
on insulin, leading to elevated plasma free fatty acid (FFA) levels, which then
results in insulin resistance in the liver and skeletal muscle. In addition to
this, these fat cells over-secrete the cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6), resistin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and
under-secrete adiponectin (an insulin-sensitizing
cytokine), all of which contribute to the further progression of insulin
resistance, atherosclerosis, and inflammation.
PPAR-gamma activation results in FFA uptake
and storage in subcutaneous adipose tissue over visceral adipose tissue.
Decreasing plasma FFA levels will reduce insulin resistance. In addition to
decreasing plasma FFA levels, PPAR-gamma activation has been also shown to
increase GLUT-1 and GLUT-4 receptors on skeletal muscle and the liver in rats,
increase adiponectin secretion and decrease TNF-alpha
secretion resulting in decreased blood glucose levels. Two thiazolidinediones
will be examined here:
·
troglitazone
·
pioglitazone.
Troglitazone
The study found troglitazone
to decrease plasma fatty acid levels, fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides,
and fasting plasma insulin levels in type 2 diabetics, resulting in increased
insulin sensitivity. The PPAR-gamma agonist troglitazone
has been shown to be effective in treating type-2 diabetes and insulin
resistance, but it has been removed from the market due to cases of hepatotoxicity.
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone has been shown to result in similar
changes in fasting plasma FFA, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose levels
as troglitazone, except pioglitazone
caused these changes without affecting fasting or glucose-stimulated insulin levels.pioglitazone decreasing the fat content of the
liver. Pioglitazone has also been shown to increase
HDL levels in patients with type-2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
Natural Dietary Supplements Targeting PPAR
-Lignans and Fatty Acids
Due to the potential side effects
associated with the current pharmaceutical drugs that target PPAR receptors,
safe alternatives are being searched for. New research is being done with
various lignans and fatty acids to measure their
ability to activate the PPAR receptors.
Sesamin
Sesamin
is a naturally occurring lignan found in sesame seeds
and oil. A lignan is a molecule that combines with a
receptor or another entity acting as an "activator." Sesamin has been shown to be a potent PPAR-alpha agonist.
The majority of sesamin research has been done on
rats, but the results are very promising for use of sesamin
to treat type-2 diabetes and obesity. Fat can be oxidized in the mitochondria
and the peroxisomes of cells, the majority of this
oxidation occurring in skeletal muscle cells and the liver.
PPAR alpha activation by sesamin increases fat oxidation in mitochondria and peroxisomes by increasing the expression of enzymes
involved in beta-oxidation of fatty acids. Of vital important, sesamin increases the expression of the mitochondrial
enzyme carnitine palmitoyl transferase (CPT). CPT, the rate-limiting enzyme in
beta-oxidation of fatty acids in skeletal muscle and liver cell mitochondria,
is found on the outer membrane of mitochondria and carries fatty acids across
the membrane into the mitochondria by binding to them. Increasing the
expression of CPT will allow more fatty acids to be transported into the
mitochondria where they can be oxidized. In addition to increasing the
oxidation of fat, sesamin supplementation has also
been shown to decrease lipogenesis by decreasing lipogenic enzymes in the liver.
Tetradecyl Thioacetic Acid
(TTA)
TetradecylThioacetic Acid (TTA), a non beta-oxidizable
fatty acid analog, has been shown to activate all three of the PPAR receptors
in rats, in the ranking order of Alpha > Beta/Delta > Gamma. TTA has been
shown to increase insulin sensitivity by increasing hepatic fat oxidation and ketogenesis while draining fatty acids from the blood and extrahepatic tissues. This drainage of fatty acids by the
liver increases the ability of adipocytes and
skeletal muscle in uptake glucose.
TTA has been shown to cause mitochondrial
and peroxisomal proliferation in rats, leading to
increased beta-oxidation of fatty acids in the liver, along with increasing
uncoupling protein-2 (UCP-2) expression. UCP-2, and UCP-3, is involved in preventing
the accumulation of oxygen-specific free radicals and in regulating lipogenesis and ketogenesis.
UCP-2 is found throughout the body. These three adaptations, increased
mitochondria, peroxisomes, and UCP-2 concentrations,
all aid in increasing insulin sensitivity and reducing adiposity.
Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA)
Conjugated Linoleic
Acid (CLA) is a mix of isomers of linoleic
acid (commercially sold as a 50:50 mix of cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12
isomers). Studies done on humans have shown decreased body fat and/or increased
lean mass (though results are mixed). CLA is believed to influence body
composition through regulation of lipid metabolism. Studies have shown CLA to
inhibit transcription of enzymes involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis/lipogenesis, desaturation of
fatty acids, and triglyceride synthesis. It is believed that CLA is a PPARgamma antagonist, resulting in the attenuation of fat
cell differentiation.
Oleoylethanolamide (OEA)
Oleoylethanolamide (OEA) is an endogenous lipid being
investigated as a potential anti-obesity drug. OEA is synthesized in the
intestines. Its synthesis is increased with food intake and decreased with fasting.
OEA has been shown to have anorexic properties, meaning it decreases food
intake. A study done on rats showed that OEA's ability to decrease appetite did
not change plasma levels of various intestinal hormones involved in satiety,
such as ghrelin
and cholecystokinin, showing OEA works independently
of these hormones. OEA is also an activator of the PPAR receptor. Activation of
PPARα by OEA will cause an increase in fat
oxidation along with a decrease in fat storage, as described in the above sections.
OEA's ability to decrease appetite and regulate body weight is accomplished by
the activation of PPARα
Stearoylethanolamide (SEA)
Stearoylethanolamide (SEA) has been shown to decrease food
intake independent of PPAR and without changing hematochemical
parameters such as glucose and triglyceride levels or leptin
(a hormone involved with satiety) expression. sThe appetite decreasing effect of SEA was associated
with a reduction in liver stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1
(SCD-1) mRNA expression. SCD-1 is the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis
of monounsaturated fats and its reduction is believed to lead to increased
fatty acid oxidation and decreased lipogenesis in
skeletal muscle and the liver.
CONCLUSION:
PPARs play
key roles in the regulation of energy homeostasis and inflammation, and
agonists of PPARα and
are
currently used therapeutically. Fibrates, first used
in the 1970s for their lipid-modifying properties, were later shown to activate
PPARα. These agents
lower plasma triglycerides and VLDL particles and increase HDL cholesterol,
effects that are associated with cardiovascular benefit. Thiazolidinediones,
acting via PPAR
, influence free fatty acid flux and thus
reduce insulin resistance and blood glucose levels. PPARgamma
agonists are therefore used to treat type 2 diabetes. PPARα and
agonists also affect inflammation, vascular
function, and vascular remodeling. As knowledge of the pleiotropic
effects of these agents’ advances, further potential indications are being
revealed, including roles in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and
the metabolic syndrome. Dual PPARα/
agonists which are currently in development
look set to combine the properties of thiazolidinediones
and fibrates, and they hold considerable promise for
improving the management of type 2 diabetes and providing an effective
therapeutic option for treating the multifactorial
components of CVD and the metabolic syndrome. The functions of a third PPAR isoform, PPAR
, and its potential as a therapeutic target
are currently under investigation. PPARs are promising targets for therapeutic
intervention, through the development of agonists but also antagonists, in
disorders such as obesity and diabetes, atherosclerosis, chronic inflammatory
diseases, and tumorigenesis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors
thank Shri. T.G. Hari
Kumar, General Secretary, Ezhuthachan College of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Marayamuttom for providing the
necessary facilities.
REFERENCES
1.
Larsen
TM, Toubro S, Astrup A. Efficacy and safety of
dietary supplements containing CLA for the treatment of obesity: evidence from
animal and human studies. J Lipid Res. 2003 Dec;44(12):2234-41.
2.
Gaullier
JM, Halse J, Hoye K,
Kristiansen K, Fagertun H, Vik
H, Gudmundsen O. Conjugated linoleic
acid supplementation for 1 y reduces body fat mass in healthy overweight
humans. Am J Clin Nutr.
2004 Jun;79(6):1118-25.
3.
Lefebvre
AM, Chen I, Desreumaux P, Najib
J, Fruchart JC, Geboes K,
Briggs M, Heyman R, Auwerx
J 1998 Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g promotes the development
of colon tumors in C57BL/6J-APCMin/1 mice. Nat Med 4:1053–1057
4.
Saez E, Tontonoz P, Nelson MC, Alvarez JGA, Ming UT, Baird S, Thomazy VA, EvansRM1998 Activators of the nuclear receptor PPARg enhance colon polyp
formation. Nat Med 4: 1058-1061
5.
Ito Y,
Azrolan N, O’Connell A, Walsh A, Breslow
JL 1990 Hypertriglyceridemia as a result of human apo CIII gene expression in transgenic mice. Science
249:790–793
6.
Lock
EA, Mitchell AM, Elcombe CR 1989 Biochemical
mechanisms of induction of hepatic peroxisome
proliferation. Annu Rev Pharmacol
Toxicol 29:145–163
7.
Gulick T, Cresci S, Caira T, Moore DD,
Kelly DP 1994 The peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor regulates mitochondrial fatty acid oxidative enzyme gene expression.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11012–11016
Received on 25.02.2014 Accepted on 10.03.2014
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Res.
Pharm. Sci. 4(1): Jan.-Mar.
2014; Page 32-37